maybe steve jobs was right. he (in)famously said you can’t design for customers because they don’t know what they want. or if you design for them, they’ll want something new by the time you have your product built.
i’m wondering if there’s something to this, particularly when it comes to health. i was struck by this idea while reading about the brain-dead design of myplate. myplate is the government’s latest visual representation of what we should eat. and it’s pretty simple. it shows you proportionally what you should eat from which category.
but researchers have come out against it, saying myplate needs to include more. more details. more data. more guidance. just more. that’s what the people-on-the-street say in the video below, too.
but do we really want more data? we’re not so good with the data we have. those interviewed didn’t know the number of food groups. granted, some of their recall error is the residue of previous food pyramids, but we’re stumped by too much data. we’re investigating simplifying nutrition labels and energy bills to make it easier, not more complex.
the current myplate is an image i can hold in my mind’s eye and work with. i may eat canned peaches in light syrup—not as good as raw fruit, of course—but i’d be eating fruit, because i know fruit makes up a big part of this plate. would statistics or portion sizes or any other data be necessary to make this requirement clearer?
maybe the government was following in jobs’ venerable footsteps. they decided we don’t know what we want. they just gave it to us. perhaps that’s an approach we should be considering more, not less.
we’ll be talking about giving employees what they need versus what they want during november’s cohealth tweet chat. join us on wednesday, november 16 at noon on twitter.
- dr. marion nestle weighs in on myplate vs. harvard healthy eating plate
- sign, sign, everywhere a sign. do this, don’t do that, can’t you read the sign?
- can your cafeteria receipt change your eating habits?