can george clooney sweeten a layoff?

December 18, 2009

in change,talent

let’s just get this out of the way, shall we?george clooney 2

would i want to be laid off by george clooney? hell, yeah.

would i give up my severance for the opportunity? probably; i’m not above that.

would i think less harshly of my company’s layoffs if he were doing the dirty work? possibly. i mean, c’mon…it’s george clooney we’re talking about, people. if my company could wrangle attention from this level of heart-throbbing talent, i’d have to give the whole process some props.

now that i got the fantasy portion of this post out of the way [poof!], let’s get down to business. the business of layoffs.

in case you missed it, george clooney’s bringing his characteristic dash to layoffs this holiday season in a new movie, up in the air. he plays ryan bingham, a high-flyin’ layoff artist, hired by corporations too spineless to deliver the bad news themselves.

the concept got me thinking of firing and layoffs, of which we’ve been reading or personally experiencing far too much lately. this post isn’t about the layoffs that a company arrives at due to harsh economic times and after exhausting other alternatives, like change in leadership, process improvement, hiring and salary freezes, temporarily cutting salaries, and work furloughs. it’s about seizing layoffs as a simple solution to a complex problem―as in an across-the-board 10% rif to quickly cut costs.

let me give you three straightforward reasons i don’t like them. feel free to refute or add to them.

reason #1: they’re inhumane. in up in the air, the young, female upstart determines companies can save money by laying off via videoconferencing. über-efficiency! clooney, because he’s clooney and we can never really be allowed to hate him, throws down his cloak of integrity (and his mileage card, which would soon be worthless if technology held sway) and insists that’s no way of doing business. there’s honor in laying people off face-to-face, tissue box properly positioned in front of you. well, i tell you. there are plenty of managers who would kill to implement that policy. because laying people off is damn hard, no matter how well executed. it takes a toll on those on both sides of the table. and those who bear the message are often play pieces too―not the ones who engineered the layoff or influenced consideration of alternative cost-savings efforts.

reason #2: they’re cowardly. tell me you can’t think of someone who was laid off who should’ve been let go for lackluster performance long ago. or of someone else who got caught up because of the formulaic approach and the headcount reduction required. layoffs are the lazy manager’s performance management system, used to weed out poor performers and suggest a high performance culture. layoffs done in this vein may offset survivor’s guilt, but they destroy the credibility of the company’s talent processes and equate layoffs with the shame and embarrassment that affect 46% of unemployed americans today.

if you’ve experienced a layoff, you know about reason #3: they stick in a company’s craw. it’s not just the too-much-work, too-few-people scenario. that’s an everyday fact of corporate life. or the loss of focus while everyone tries to figure out who’s next on the chopping block. or even the survivor’s guilt and subsequent lack of engagement that takes years to restore. it’s the severing of company promise—the hidden costs of layoffs.

yes, layoffs can be a necessary part of keeping a business alive. and yes, companies rebound from them. but once a company uses layoffs to manage the numbers, employees know they are just a number and that the leadership who asks them to give their all is not willing to give them even 5-10%. that’s a problem not even the dreamy george clooney can fix.


note: i haven’t seen up in the air yet, so my comments on the movie are based solely on my intellectual and artistic admiration for george clooney and available reviews.

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Mark Hornung December 23, 2009 at 1:11 pm

Couldn’t agree more:

By all means, see the movie. It’s very well done and for road warriors hits very close to home.


fran December 23, 2009 at 4:35 pm


i’ve since seen the movie. it was a much sadder view than i’d expected. it’s theme of loneliness left an impact, as did vera farmiga. she was awesome…almost stole the movie from george.

i read your post — it’s a good one. thanks for sharing it,



TomPier May 4, 2010 at 4:39 am

great post as usual!


Previous post:

Next post: